馬丁文集7：教育語言研究（簡體書）

《上海交通大學文治堂學術著作叢書·馬丁文集7：教育語言研究》為《馬丁文集》第7卷，收錄了馬丁自1981年以來發表的以及即將發表的15篇關于教育語言的論文，主要涉及伯恩斯坦的教育學理論、維果斯基的教育學理論、韓禮德的教育學理論，以及在這些教育學理論基礎上發展的基于語類的“悉尼學派”的教育學理論。基于語類的教育學理論中最大的亮點是讀寫教學理論。

馬丁（J.R.Martin），博士，國際著名系統功能語言學學家，悉尼大學教授、語言學系系主任，“語言評價理論”和“積極話語分析”創始人。研究興趣主要有系統理論、功能理論、語篇語義學、語域理論、語類理論、多模式系統、積極／批評話語分析、教育語言學和社會符號學。1998年當選為澳大利亞人文學會研究員，2003年因其對語言學和語文學的貢獻榮獲澳大利亞“百年紀念獎章”。曾任Text雜志“評價系統”專刊主編（2003），Discourse＆Society專刊合刊主編（2004）。發表論文140多篇，出版著作數十部。代表性著作有English Text（1992）;Working with Discourse（2003，revised2007）;Re/Reading the Past（2003）;Language Typology（2004）;The Language of Evaluation（2005）;Genre Relations（2008），Language，Knowledge and Pedagogy（2007）;Deploying Functional Grammar（2010）;New Discourse on Language（2010）.
王振華，博士，上海交通大學外國語學院教授、博士生導師、學科負責人、英語系副主任、外國語言文學博士後流動站站長。曾任河南大學外語學院科研副院長，河南省教育廳學術技術帶頭人。1999年獲澳大利亞悉尼大學語言學碩士學位，2003年獲河南大學語言學博士學位，2004年入復旦大學外國語言文學博士後站，研究課題為《語言評價系統與司法語言規范研究》。兼任中國功能語言學研究會副會長；中國英漢語篇研究會副會長；中國法律語言學研究會副會長；金博大律師事務所上海分所專家顧問；《當代外語研究》和《功能語言學與語篇分析研究》編委；英國Classroom Discourse、Journal of Multicultural Discourses、《現代外語》和《福建師范大學學報》審稿人。出版著作（含教材）8部，發表論文50余篇，主編《馬丁文集》8卷，特約主編《當代外語研究》2010年第10期，承擔各級各類科研項目14項，在研項目有《法律語篇的行為規范研究》（上海市社科規劃項目，2007）；《語篇語義研究的理論體系建構與實踐》（國家社科項目，2008）；《人際和諧的態度考量》（“211工程”第三期資助項目，2010）。研究興趣主要有系統功能語言學、語言評價理論、語篇語義研究、法律語言研究、語用學、教育語言研究。

The Author's Introduction
Acknowledgements
The Ontogenesis of Written Genre （ with John Rothery）（1981）
Systemic Functional Linguistics and an Understanding of Written Text（1984）
What a Functional Approach to the Writing Task Can Show Teachers about "Good Writing" （with John Rothery）（1986）
Intervening in the Process of Writing Development （1986）
Genre and Literacy:Modeling Context in Educational Linguistics（1993）
In/visible Education:Class, Gender and Pedagogy in Educating Rita and Dead Poets'Society （with Anne Cranny-Francis） （1994）
Linguistics and the Consumer:The Practice of Theory （1997）
Mentoring Semogenesis:"Genre-based"Literacy Pedagogy （1999）
Grammar Meets Genre:Reflections on the "Sydney School" （2000）
Designing Literacy Pedagogy:Scaffolding Asymmetries （with David Rose）（2005）
Metadiscourse:Designing Interaction in Genre-based Literacy Programs（2006）
Interacting with Text:The Role of Dialogue in Learning to Read and Write （with David Rose）（2007）
Genre and Language Learning:A Social Semiotic Perspective （2009）
Historical Cosmologies:Epistemology and Axiology in Australian Secondary School History （with K.Maton&E.Matruglio）（2010）
Writing and Genre Studies
References
Index

The genre-based approach to teaching writing， illustrated above， has had aprofound impact on literacy education in Australia， particularly in primary schooling and in adult ESL and academic literacy programs. As writing is the principal means by which students' academic learning is evaluated， the goal of this methodology has been to provide students with resources to achieve successin formal evaluation. Over the past decade these successes have been extendedinto teaching reading， using carefully designed strategies to support students torecognise language patterns in academic texts， enabling them to read with critical comprehension， and to use these language patterns in their writing. This methodology， known as Reading to Learn. （Rose 2004c， 2005a， 2006b， 2007），approaches reading first from the perspective of genre， then the patterns in which a text's field unfolds through the genre， and finally the wordings with insentences that realise these discourse semantic patterns. The methodology isillustrated here with a lesson in which adult ESL students learn to read a discussion about immigration in Australia， in an academic preparation course.An extract is presented as text（2）.The first paragraph presents the issue， the second paragraph presents one position on immigration's impact onemployment， the third presents the author's opposing position.
（2）Plus to immigration equation
Both before and since the White Australia policy of the 1950s， immigration has been a political hot potato-yet the economic evidence shows immigration has been extremely good for the nation. In spite of the facts， today's econorruc nationalist parties - One Nation， the Australian Democrats， Advance Australia， the Greens and Australia First - espouse poliaes of greatly reduced or zero net migration. They do so for several reasons.
The most common argument against allowing migrants in numbers is based on a lopsided view of the impact on Australia's economy. The Advance Australia party wants to call a "halt to all immigration until we have solved our unemployment problems" as if the only impact of migration is to takejobs which nught otherwise be available to unemployed Australians.
……