語言語用理論及應用研究（簡體書）

語言是人類區別于動物的重要特徵，甚至是關鍵特徵，是人類本質的重要外在形式。研究其機制必將加深對人類本質的了解。而語用學就是以語言使用和語言理解為研究對象的學問，它反映人們使用和理解語言的客觀規律，是一個動態的知識體系。語用學這門學科本身就早已表明它是與語言應用有關的一門學問；而語言應用問題，必然關係到人們心理上的認知，關係到社會和文化，關係到人與人之間在不同場合下的交往、協商與順應。本書探討了語用學中的預設、模糊限制語、會話合作原則及禮貌原則等重要理論及其在現實中的運用，并對禮貌用語和法庭辯論中的模糊限制語等語言現象進行了英漢對比分析。其中重點討論了語用預設在英漢廣告語、大學生中文辯論賽中的應用及模糊限制語在英漢法庭辯論中的應用。本書在最后一章進一步結合英語教學探討了大學生的英語語用能力與其英語學習動機之間的關係。本書的研究側重于語言理論的應用，有助于人們理解現實生活中的語言現象及隱藏于其后的語言本質，是充分運用我們豐富的漢語資源去研究具有中國特色的語用現象的一次大膽嘗試。

Chapter One A Study of the Functions of Pragmatic Presupposition in Advertising Language
　1.1　Introduction
1.1.1 Importance of Advertising
1.1.2 Research Issue and Significance of the Study
1.1.3 Research Method and Data Source
1.1.4 Layout and Scope of the Study
　1.2 Literature Review
1.2.1 Pragmatic Presupposition
1.2.2 Advertising Language
　1.3 Analysis of the Functions of Pragmatic Presupposition in Advertising Language
1.3.1 The Research Question
1.3.2 Data Collection
1.3.3 Data Analysis
1.3.4 Results and Discussion
　1.4 Conclusions
1.4.1 Findings of the Study
1.4.2 Limitations of the Study
1.4.3 Suggestions for Further Research
Chapter Two A Study of Trap-setting in Chinese Debate Tournaments——from the Perspective of Pragmatic Presupposition
　2.1 Introduction
2.1.1 Significance of Research on Debate
2.1.2 Purpose and Significance of the Study
2.1.3 Layout and Scope of the Study
　2.2 Literature Review
2.2.1 0n Debates
2.2.2 0n Pragmatic Presupposition
2.2.3 Trap-setting
　2.3 Analysis of Trap-setting with Pragmatic Presuppositions in Chinese Intercollegiate Debate Tournaments
2.3.1 Research Objectives
2.3.2 Data Collection
2.3.3 Data Analysis
2.3.4 Results and Discussions
　2.4 Conclusions
2.4.1 Summaryofthe Study
2.4.2 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Research
　2.5 Appendix: Excerpts Analyzed in this chapter
Chapter Three A Pragmatic Analysis of Hedges in Court room Arguments
　3.1 Introduction
3.1.1 General Introduction
3.1.2 Objectives and Significance
3.1.3 Methodology
3.1.4 Layout and Scope of the Study
　3.2 Literature Review
3.2.1 Previous Studies on the Courtroom Arguments
3.2.2 Previous Studies on Hedges and Hedging
　3.3 Pragmatic Analysis of Hedges in Courtroom Arguments
3.3.1 Objectives
3.3.2 Data Collection
3.3.3 Data Analysis
3.3.4 Results and Discussion
　3.4 Case Analysis
3.4.1 0bjectives
3.4.2 Data Collection
3.4.3 Data Analysis
3.4.4 Findings and Discussion
　3.5 Conclusions
3.5.1 Summaryofthe Study
3.5.2 Limitations and Suggestions for Further Research
　3.6 Appendix l Courtroom arguments in Chinese
　3.7 Appendix 2 Courtroom arguments in English
　3.8 Appendix 3 List oftheArguments
Chapter Four A Study of the Rhetoric in English Com,munication——From the Perspective of the Violation of Cooperative Principle
　4.1 Introduction
　4.2 Literature Review
4.2.1 GricesCPTheory
4.2.2 Rhetoric
4.2.3 Previous Studies on CP and Rhetoric
　4.3 Analysis on the Rhetoric through the Violation of CP
4.3.1 Rhetoric through the Violation of the Maxim ofQuantity
4.3.2 Rhetoric through the Violation of the Maxim ofQuality
4.3.3 Rhetoric through the Violation of the Maxim of Relevance
4.3.4 Rhetoric through the Violation of the Maxim of Manner
4.3.5 Findings and Discussion
　4.4 Conclusions.
Chapter Five A Contrastive Study on Politeness Formulae in English and Chinese
　5.1 Introduction
5.1.1 Purpose of the Study
5.1.2 Significance of the Study
　5.2 Politeness Principle (PP)
5.2.1 Leechs PP
5.2.2 Gus Four Notions on Politeness in China.
5.2.3 Contrastive Overview
5.2.4 Previous Studies on PP
　5.3 Contrastive Analysis on Politeness Formulae in English and Chinese
5.3.1 Contrastive Analysis on Addresses in English and Chinese
5.3.2 Contrastive Analysis on Making Requests and Complimenting in English and Chinese.
5.3.3 Contrastive Analysis on Expressing Thanks and Apologies in English and Chinese
5.3.4 Findings and Discussion
5.4 Conclusion
　……
Chapter Six Study on the Correlation Between PragmaticCompetence and English Learning Motivationof Undergraduates
參考書目